USDA REAP 7 CFR § 4280.117: Technical Merit Determination Guide

Updated 6 September 2026 · By SolarNevs Research Desk, Dealer surveys + verified sources · 1 source · Method ↗

Key Takeaways

  • Codified under 7 CFR § 4280.117, the USDA Rural Business-Cooperative Service determines the technical merit of all REAP grant applications before funding consideration.
  • Only projects formally determined by the Agency to have technical merit are eligible for financial assistance under Subpart B.
  • Establishes three distinct evaluation tiers based on total project cost: $80,000 or less, $80,000 to $200,000, and $200,000 and greater.
  • For large systems ($200,000 and greater), technical reports must cover 7 mandatory areas, including design, permitting, and operations and maintenance.
  • Applications are scored as "pass", "pass with conditions", or "fail"; receiving a single "fail" rating disqualifies the project as being without technical merit.

Statutory Role of 7 CFR § 4280.117

Under Title 7, Part 4280, Subpart B of the Code of Federal Regulations, 7 CFR § 4280.117 governs the technical merit determination for Renewable Energy System (RES) grant and loan guarantee applications.

The Agency may engage other government agencies or recognized industry engineering experts to evaluate and score technical reports submitted under §§ 4280.118, 4280.119, and 4280.120.

Tiered Project Evaluation Criteria

The depth of the required technical documentation corresponds to total project capital expenditure:

Project Cost Tier

Applicable Cost Range

Mandatory Technical Evaluation Areas

Tier 1 (Small RES)

Total project costs of $80,000 or less

(i) Project description, (ii) Resource assessment, (iii) Project economic assessment, (iv) Key service provider qualifications

Tier 2 (Medium RES)

Total project costs less than $200,000, but more than $80,000

Tier 1 criteria plus (iv) Project construction and equipment specifications

Tier 3 (Large RES)

Total project costs of $200,000 and greater

Full 7 areas: team qualifications, agreements/permits, resource assessment, engineering, development, procurement, and O&M

Scoring Classifications & Funding Eligibility

Under 7 CFR § 4280.117(c)–(e), each evaluation area receives an explicit rating:

  • Pass: Assigned when information contains no weaknesses and meets or exceeds all federal requirements.
  • Pass with Conditions: Assigned when minor weaknesses exist that can be resolved through specific conditional terms prior to project completion.
  • Fail: Assigned when major technical deficiencies exist or mandatory areas are unaddressed.
  • Final Merit Finding: A project receiving a "fail" in any single technical report area is deemed without technical merit and rendered ineligible for competition.

Frequently asked questions

What is the function of 7 CFR § 4280.117 under the USDA REAP program?

7 CFR § 4280.117 establishes the procedure the Agency uses to evaluate technical reports and determine the technical merit of Renewable Energy System (RES) and Energy Efficiency Improvement (EEI) grant applications (August 2026).

What project cost tiers govern REAP technical merit evaluations?

Evaluations are divided into three cost tiers: projects with total costs of **$80,000 or less**, projects between **$80,000 and $200,000**, and large projects with costs of **$200,000 and greater** (August 2026).

What evaluation areas are reviewed for large RES projects of $200,000 and greater?

Under paragraph (b)(5), the Agency evaluates 7 areas: project team qualifications, agreements and permits, resource assessment, design and engineering, project development, equipment procurement and installation, and operations and maintenance (August 2026).

How are individual technical report areas scored by the Agency?

Each technical report area receives a rating of 'pass' (no weaknesses), 'pass with conditions' (minor conditional weaknesses), or 'fail' (major weaknesses or unaddressed requirements) (August 2026).

References

Related guides

More from schemes, subsidies & financing.